how do orthopedic surgeons address psychological aspects of illness?

Authors

ana-maria vranceanu department of psychiatry, behavioral medicine service, massachusetts general hospital, harvard medical school, boston, usa

reinier b. beks department of orthopaedic surgery, hand and upper extremity service, massachusetts general hospital, harvard medical school, usa

thierry g. guitton department of orthopaedic surgery, academic medical center, university of amsterdam, amsterdam, the netherlands

stein j. janssen department of orthopaedic surgery, hand and upper extremity service, massachusetts general hospital, harvard medical school, usa

abstract

background: orthopaedic surgeons have a pivotal role in transitioning the care of orthopedic patients from a biomedical to a biopsychosocial model. in an effort to foster this transition, we designed a study aimed to determine surgeons’ attitudes and practice of noticing, screening, discussing psychological illness with patients, as well as making referrals to address psychosocial issues in patients in need. additionally, we asked surgeons to rank order potential barriers to and reasons for referrals to psychosocial treatment.   methods: orthopaedic surgeons members of the science and variation group and ankle platform (n =350) completed demographics, and a 4-part survey assessing the degree to which surgeons notice, assess, screen and refer for psychological treatments, as well ranked ordered barriers to engaging in these processes. results: as a group surgeons were neutral to referral for psychological treatment and formal screening of psychological factors, and somewhat likely to notice and discuss psychological factors. surgeons were more likely to refer for psychological treatment if they engaged in research, or if they reside in south america as opposed to north america. the highest ranked barriers to screening, noticing, discussing and referring for psychological treatment were lack of time, stigma and feeling uncomfortable. conclusion: overall surgeons are likely to notice and discuss psychological factors, but less likely to formally screen or refer for psychological treatment. transition to biopsychosocial models should focus on problem solving these barriers by teaching surgeons communication skills to increase comfort with discussing psychoemotional factors associated with orthopedic problems. the use of empathic communication can be very helpful in normalizing the difficulty of coping with an orthopedic condition, and may facilitate referral.

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

How do Orthopedic Surgeons Address Psychological Aspects of Illness?

  Background: Orthopaedic surgeons have a pivotal role in transitioning the care of orthopedic patients from a biomedical to a biopsychosocial model. In an effort to foster this transition, we designed a study aimed to determine surgeons’ attitudes and practice of noticing, screening, discussing psychological illness with patients, as well as making referrals to address psychosocial issues in ...

full text

How do Orthopaedic Surgeons Address Psychological Aspects of Illness?

BACKGROUND Orthopaedic surgeons have a pivotal role in transitioning the care of orthopedic patients from a biomedical to a biopsychosocial model. In an effort to foster this transition, we designed a study aimed to determine surgeons' attitudes and practice of noticing, screening, discussing psychological illness with patients, as well as making referrals to address psychosocial issues in pati...

full text

How Well do Orthopedic Surgeons Recognize Different Models of Total Elbow Arthroplasties on Plain Radiographs with the Use of a Diagnostic Flowchart?

Background: Recognition of total elbow arthroplasties (TEAs) on plain radiographs is difficult due to a multitude ofdifferent types and models. Especially if surgery reports and documentation are not available, lost or when the primarysurgery was performed in another hospital the prosthesis type may be undeterminable. Therefore we investigatedin this platform study if a flowch...

full text

What should we do as orthopedic surgeons in catastrophic disasters?

On March 11, 2011, Japan was consecutively hit by three unprecedented disasters caused by The Great East Japan (Tohoku) Earthquake: an earthquake of magnitude 9.0, an incredibly powerful tsunami, and a nuclear power plant breakdown. As Japan had experienced The Great HanshinAwaji Earthquake in 1995, we were prepared to provide the victims with appropriate medical care to some extent. Neverthele...

full text

Training safer orthopedic surgeons

1 department of orthopaedics, barts and the london, the royal london hospital, london; 2 MSk lab, imperial College london, Charing Cross hospital, fulham, london; 3 institute of population health, university of Manchester, Manchester; 4 postgraduate School of Surgery, london deanery, london, uK. Correspondence: [email protected] and [email protected] * These authors contributed equally. Submitte...

full text

How do surgeons make intraoperative decisions?

Surgeons' intraoperative decision making is a key element of clinical practice, yet has received scant attention in the surgical literature. In recent years, serial changes in the configuration of surgical training in the UK have reduced the time spent by trainees in the operating theatre. The opportunity to replace this lost experience with active teaching of decision making is important, but ...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later


Journal title:
the archives of bone and joint surgery

جلد ۵، شماره ۱، صفحات ۲-۹

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023